Recognize Fraud Risk Potential
May 2004
Ask yourself the following question: Where would your business be if your
revenues dropped 6 percent during the course of the year? What if your
equity decreased by $127,500 during the year?
According to a recent study by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners’
(ACFE) Report to the Nation on Occupational Fraud and Abuse, businesses
are incurring such financial disasters not as a result of outside operations,
but rather internally through employee fraud. It reports that businesses
with fewer than 100 employees are the most vulnerable as their median
loss-per-fraud scheme is actually higher than that of larger organizations.
The report further explains that approximately 86 percent of the 663
cases examined had either insufficient controls or allowed employees
and management to override such controls.
According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, three out of five businesses
fail during the first five years of operation. However, one-third of
all business failures relate to some kind of fraudulent activity. This
outrageous statistic is a cause of concern for business owners. When
applied to the U.S. Gross Domestic Product, fraud translates to losses
of approximately $600 billion. Financial statement frauds account for
$4.25 million per scheme on average, according to the ACFE. Luckily,
this is the least common type of fraud. Asset misappropriation, which
includes skimming cash and inventory, accounts for 80 percent of all
occupational fraud losses—with an average loss of $60,000 when
committed by employees and $250,000 when committed by managers.
Measures can be taken, however, to reduce the risks associated with
occupational fraud such as developing and following a code of ethical
conduct, implementing a fraud hotline, allowing a certified public accountant
to review your internal control system for risks and establishing a
zero-tolerance fraud policy.
Some of the most common warning signs of fraud include: customer complaints
about billing or collection efforts; refusal of an employee to take
vacation; employees who are territorial about their work and/or refuse
help; staff taking work home; books and financial papers are inaccurate,
messy or in a confused state (i.e. the bank and books never match);
missing records; incorrect or incomplete information or inability to
provide information in a timely manner; vendor complaints about non-payment;
and unexplained, recurring adjustments to name a few.
Most internal control experts will explain that the most important
way to deter unethical activities such as fraud is to set an ethical
tone at the top of the organization. By sending a clear message to all
employees throughout the organization that unethical behavior is not
permitted, employees are less likely to rationalize their unethical
behavior.
Rationalization, together with opportunity and need for cash, are the
three elements that lead to fraud. Management must understand its role
in not only establishing a code of conduct, but also abiding by it at
all costs. A simple overstatement of meals and entertainment expenses
by a manager or person in a higher position sends a clear message down
the chain of command. Although this may be only a $10 insignificant
transaction, the overall message sent to employees is significantly
larger. Drafting an organizational code of conduct is a first step in
sending a clear message to your organization that unethical behavior
is not acceptable.
Unfortunately, the it-will-not-happen-to-us attitude is a major fallacy
because it may take only one undetected fraudulent activity to force
the doors closed on your business. Similar to failing to regularly change
the oil in an automobile, deferring the costs of implementing a strong
internal control system may save money now, but the consequences of
a weak system in the future are far worse.
Karl A. Jarek, CPA, ABV, CFS, is a shareholder for Alpern Rosenthal.
He can be reached at (412) 434-8204 or at kjarek@alpern.com.
Back

|